Epistemological Obstacles in Geometry within the Context of Gen Z Digital Culture
Hambatan Epistemologis Geometri dalam Konteks Budaya Digital Gen Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57032/jsd.v5i2.336Kata Kunci:
Epistemological Obstacles, Geometry, Gen Z, Digital CultureAbstrak
Geometry demands profound deductive-axiomatic reasoning; however, Generation Z has grown up within a digital culture that prioritizes instant visual information. This study aims to analyze the epistemological obstacles in geometry encountered by Gen Z students resulting from the influence of these digital culture characteristics. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method involving 250 high school students born between 2007 and 2010 in the City and Regency of Cirebon. Data were collected through diagnostic tests and in-depth interviews, then analyzed using Brousseau’s theoretical framework. The results identify a shift in the forms of obstacles: first, visual-perceptual obstacles, where students validate geometric truth solely based on visual appearance, adhering to a "what looks right is right" mindset while disregarding deductive logic. Second, instrumental obstacles, characterized by a dependence on instant problem-solving applications, which hinders the construction of mental concepts. Digital culture is shown to facilitate an "illusion of understanding" and reduce student resilience in engaging with lengthy mathematical proofs. This study contributes as a foundation for designing didactic strategies to mitigate the negative effects of the culture of instant thinking, emphasizing the importance of transitioning from digital visualization toward rigorous analytical proof.
Referensi
Agustin, R. D., Susiswo, Sa’dijah, C., & Sukoriyanto. (2024). Obstacles student mathematics semantic representation to solving geometry problems. 030001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0194841
Alghadari, F., Arisha, B., Hidayah, N., Saparuddin, S., & Dharma, B. E. (2025). Uncovering Gaps in Deductive Geometry Thinking: Rasch-Based Evidence from Students’ Work on Quadratic Functions. Journal of Instructional Mathematics, 6(2), 117–129.
Almubarak, M., Maat, S. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2025). Evolving three decades of geometry learning strategies: A combination of bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(6), em2654. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16515
Amalia, S., Supriadi, S., & Arisetyawan, A. (2025). Problem-Based Learning with Pop-Up Books to Boost Mathematical Critical Thinking in 6th Grade Geometry. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 4(4), 3682–3698. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i4.2471
Azmi, M. P., Purwanto, P., Anwar, L., & Muksar, M. (2025). Epistemological Obstacles in Solving 2D Geometry Problems Using Adversity Quotient. TEM Journal, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM141-19
Cahdriyana, R. A., & Sintawati, M. (2024). Epistemological obstacle on the topic of prism: A phenomenological study. Journal of Honai Math, 7(3), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v7i3.674
Cuesta, W. R. (2023). Tasks to promote argumentation in math class based on Dynamic Geometry Software. Rastros Rostros, 25(2), 1.
Dorel, L. (2023). The Relationship Between Visual and Abstract Comprehension in Spatial Geometry, and its Importance to Developing Spatial Perception and Vision. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 30(4), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v30.4.3
Downton, A., & Livy, S. (2022). Insights into Students’ Geometric Reasoning Relating to Prisms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(7), 1543–1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10219-5
Facciaroni, L., Gambini, A., & Mazza, L. (2023). The difficulties in geometry: A quantitative analysis based on results of mathematics competitions in Italy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 259–270.
Gjone, G. (2024). Review – Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Didactique des Mathematiques, 1970-1990. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v7i1.146659
Guerrero-Ortiz, C., & Camacho-Machín, M. (2022). Characterizing Tasks for Teaching Mathematics in Dynamic Geometry System and Modelling Environments. Mathematics, 10(8), 1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081239
Haj Yahya, A., & Hershkowitz, R. (2024). Interference of prototypical geometry representations in students’ construction of concepts and development of proofs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2024.2386619
Hendriyanto, A., Suryadi, D., Juandi, D., Dahlan, J. A., Hidayat, R., Wardat, Y., Sahara, S., & Muhaimin, L. H. (2024). The didactic phenomenon: Deciphering students’ learning obstacles in set theory. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp517-544
Husni Sabil, Sela Michella O. U. Simanjuntak, Dewi Iriani, & Ranisa Junita. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Spatial Ability in Geometry Material. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 13(3), 436–448. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i3.77083
Jablonski, S., & Ludwig, M. (2023). Teaching and Learning of Geometry—A Literature Review on Current Developments in Theory and Practice. Education Sciences, 13(7), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070682
Kandaga, T., Rosjanuardi, R., & Juandi, D. (2022). Epistemological Obstacle in Transformation Geometry Based on van Hiele’s Level. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4), em2096. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11914
Kyaw, K. M., & Vidákovich, T. (2025). The relationship between spatial reasoning and geometric reasoning in teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(8), em2684. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16718
Lavicza, Z., Abar, C. A. A. P., & Tejera, M. (2023). Spatial geometric thinking and its articulation with the visualization and manipulation of objects in 3D. Educação Matemática Pesquisa Revista Do Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados Em Educação Matemática, 25(2), 258–277.
Lepore, M. (2024). A holistic framework to model student’s cognitive process in mathematics education through fuzzy cognitive maps. Heliyon, 10(16), e35863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35863
Lisarelli, G. (2023). Transition Tasks for Building Bridges Between Dynamic Digital Representations and Cartesian Graphs of Functions. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00121-2
Lisitano, F., & Hickie, J. (2025). Planet Vire: The Apex of Digital Realism and Spatial Interaction. In F. Lisitano & J. Hickie (Eds.), The Evolune Metaverse: Meta-Avatars, Spatial Computing, and the Evolution of Humans with AI (pp. 417–501). Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-1588-1_8
Peredy, Z., Vigh, L., Wei, Q., & Jiang, M. (2024). Analysing generation Z communication attitudes, values and norms. Acta Periodica (Edutus), 30, 4–19.
Prata-Linhares, M., da Fontoura, H. A., & de Almeida Pimenta, M. A. (2023). From Instrumentalization to Integration of Technologies for Creative Teaching: Transformations in Times of Crisis. In Teacher Education in the Wake of Covid-19: ISATT 40th Anniversary Yearbook (pp. 159–174). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-368720230000041018
Prediger, S., Götze, D., Holzäpfel, L., Rösken-Winter, B., & Selter, C. (2022). Five principles for high-quality mathematics teaching: Combining normative, epistemological, empirical, and pragmatic perspectives for specifying the content of professional development. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.969212
Roche, C. M., & Szobonya, P. E. (2022). Transformational soft power of generation Z: analysis of the geo-culturalization of the landscape. JIL, 391.
Salman Farid, A. (2024). Dynamics of Changes in Literacy Culture in the Social Media Era: Comparative Study of the Millennial Generation and Generation Z. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i12.15885
Sudirman, S., Kusumah, Y. S., Martadiputra, B. A. P., & Runisah, R. (2023). Epistemological obstacle in 3D geometry thinking: Representation, spatial structuring, and measurement. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(4), 292–301.
Ulfa, N., & Hamdi, D. M. (2025). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan soal aljabar dan geometri ditinjau dari learning obstacle epistemologis dan ontogeni. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 740–758.
Wang, M., Mohd Matore, M. E. E., & Rosli, R. (2025). A systematic literature review on analytical thinking development in mathematics education: trends across time and countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1523836
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Citation Check
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Abas Hidayat
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
